Indian tragedy: Muslims seem okay to sell girls to foreign men, but kill Hindus who date them

Indian tragedy. Sabiha Banu, 15, of Mangalore sold to Abu Bakr Al Moum, 55, of Nigeria.

The couple, Sabiha Banu, 15, and Abu Bakr al Moum, 55, of Nigeria.  

The picture is heart wrenching. Sabiha Banu,  who some say is just 15, of Mangalore married (sold) to Abu Bakr Al Moum, 55, who is probably 10 years older than the girl's father.

Just yesterday I and Chris Gay, managing director of Engage Africa Now were discussing about sexual slavery of the minor Baloch boys and women in Balochistan and Hindu women in Sindh province and Punjabi women in Punjab, stronghold of the army. Mr Gay told me human trafficking is a grave issue in India too. 

In India Muslim exclusivity is a major problem. Even today if a Muslim girl marries or dates a Hindu man, he is most likely to get killed savagely.

Earlier this month, there was news that Muslim family members of a girl had killed the very young and handsome Hindu male in the Indian capital. The man, Ankit Saxena, 23, had been dating the 20-year-old woman for the past three years, against the wishes of her family because they are from different religious communities, according to the police, NDTV reported. 

The report said Ankit was attacked allegedly by his girlfriend's parents, uncle and under-aged brother. The report said the victim was beaten and then his body was slashed with a knife. The road, where he was slaughtered, was full of blood.

"I was going to meet him and then someone told me he had been stabbed with a knife. We were going to marry. He called me and told me he wanted to marry me, so we were meeting," the girl told reporters.

Carl Clemens, who is public relations director of the American friends of Balochistan, and is visiting India these days, said, Ankit Saxena's killing "was one of five such cases within a single week that the media reported."

In one case last October, father and brother of a 19-year-old Muslim girl were arrested for the murder of Lakshman Singh Kalura,32, who was found dead with his legs crushed along railway tracks close to Railwala town, 13 km from Haridwar. The killing led the majority Hindu community enraged, forcing the 17 families in the area to flee, the Indian Express reported.

Ankit Saxena, 23, was killed February 3  by  relatives of a 20 year old  Muslim girl and  his  body slashed. Picture courtesy NDTV

The bigotry of Muslims has been a big problem and was used by the British to divide India. In 1947 they opted for Pakistan for "Islam" and fought with their Hindu neighbors who were opposed to the idea .They raised slogans lay kar rahain gay Pakistan, marr kar lain gay Pakistan, seena taan kay lain gay Pakistan. which translates "We will get Pakistan (at any cost by dividing India); We will get Pakistan even if we have to die for it; We will boldly take Pakistan."

These Muslims, who then left India, instead of proudly calling themselves Hindustanis have adopted a fake name mohajirs, or immigrants in southeastern Sindh province. Since Muslims had ruled over many parts of India they suffer from an Islamo-fascist imperial mindset that consider Hindus inferior to them.

Around 100 million Hindus fell victims to Muslim genocide spanning eight centruies.

Congress mistake in 1947

In 1947, Congress president at the time, Maulana Abul Kalaam Azad, under Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru instructions refused to support a free Balochistan. Azad nontheless had made an impassioned plea to Indian Muslims not to leave their motherland. But many of these Muslims still left for Pakistan where they are today treated as second class citizens and fifth column of India.

Ten days ago, visiting Indian scholar Shakti Munshi told a meeting that the Khan of Kalat, Mir Ahmedyar Khan, had even proposed a West or East India, like Pakistan had two wings West and East Pakistan when it was born. Unfortunately, Nehru allowed Balochistan to slip away from India's hand.

However, another Indian analyst who is well aware of the historical background of the Partition holocaust believes, the assertion was unture’. "It is not in his (Khan of Kalat) autobiography and has never ever been said so far by anyone in London, Rawalpindi or Delhi.... The Hindus who never wanted partition remained in the middle, and the Muslims who wanted Partition took away two chunks on East and West."